Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section : a systematic review update

dc.contributor.authorGoldstuck, Norman D.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorSteyn, Petrus S.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-14T07:07:21Z
dc.date.available2019-02-14T07:07:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-18
dc.descriptionCITATION: Goldstuck, N. D. & Steyn, P. S. 2017. Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section : a systematic review update. International Journal of Women’s Health, 9:205-212, doi:10.2147/IJWH.S132391.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://www.dovepress.com
dc.description.abstractBackground: Women who undergo a cesarean section (CS) are in a unique position to receive the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). They may also want to use the IUD as a long-acting reversible contraceptive method provided the IUD is safe and effective in the presence of a CS scar. Search strategy: We researched and reviewed the MEDLINE, POPLINE, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from January 1968 to June 2015. Selection criteria: Eligible studies reported event rates or practical problems relating to IUD usage in post-placental or interval insertion (>90 days) after CS. Studies with ≥20 subjects were included. Data collection and analysis: Analysis of eligible data collected from the search followed the PRISMA guidelines. Main results: Twelve eligible studies of post-placental IUD insertion after CS included four randomized controlled trials of post-placental versus delayed insertion. Women randomized to delayed insertion were less likely to receive a device. Six studies examined the problem of missing IUD threads at follow-up with only 30%–60% presence of strings observed. Conclusion: The IUD is a long-acting reversible contraceptive method that is suitable for use in all women undergoing CS. The problems of device expulsion, missing threads at follow-up, and the tendency of increased puerperal bleeding need to be solved. Solutions are proposed.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.dovepress.com/insertion-of-intrauterine-devices-after-cesarean-section-a-systematic--peer-reviewed-article-IJWH
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent8 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationGoldstuck, N. D. & Steyn, P. S. 2017. Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section : a systematic review update. International Journal of Women’s Health, 9:205-212, doi:10.2147/IJWH.S132391
dc.identifier.issn1179-1411 (online)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.2147/IJWH.S132391
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/105411
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherDove Medical Pressen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectPost-placental IUDen_ZA
dc.subjectIntrauterine devicesen_ZA
dc.subjectContraceptives -- Reversibleen_ZA
dc.subjectCesarean sectionen_ZA
dc.titleInsertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section : a systematic review updateen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
goldstuck_insertion_2017.pdf
Size:
339.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: