Where is property? Some thoughts on the theoretical implications of Daniels v Scribante

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBoggenpoel, Zsa-Zsaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorSlade, Bradleyen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-19T06:19:44Z
dc.date.available2023-01-19T06:19:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionCITATION: Boggenpoel, Z. & Slade, B. 2020. Where is property? Some thoughts on the theoretical implications of Daniels v Scribante. Constitutional Court Review, 10:379–399, doi:10.2989/CCR.2020.0014.en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://constitutionalcourtreview.co.zaen_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe theoretical implications of the Constitutional Court’s decision in Daniels v Scribante are analysed in this article. With reference to Jane Baron’s theory of the contested commitments of property, it considers the place of property, or ownership, in resolving property disputes in the new constitutional dispensation. The starting point of a dispute involving property is important in the sense that it may determine the potential outcome, or remedy that is awarded, in any particular dispute. Placing property at the centre, or at the heart of any dispute that may involve property, can in certain circumstances go against the constitutional aspirations of healing the divisions of the past and building a society based on fundamental values, such as human dignity. With reference to the arguments of progressive theorists, it is argued that the Constitutional Court in Daniels placed property on the fringes; indicating that property owners may have to sacrifice more in protecting the rights of non-owners. Therefore, the Daniels decision is an important decision for our evolving understanding of the place of property in democratic South Africa.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://constitutionalcourtreview.co.za/volume-x-2020/
dc.description.versionPublisher's versionen_ZA
dc.format.extent22 pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBoggenpoel, Z. & Slade, B. 2020. Where is property? Some thoughts on the theoretical implications of Daniels v Scribante. Constitutional Court Review, 10:379–399, doi:10.2989/CCR.2020.0014.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2073-6215 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.2989/CCR.2020.0014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/126246
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherNISCen_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectPropertyen_ZA
dc.subjectDispute resolution (Law)en_ZA
dc.subjectProperty law in societyen_ZA
dc.subjectUnderstanding of propertyen_ZA
dc.subjectOwnershipen_ZA
dc.subjectDaniels v Scribanteen_ZA
dc.titleWhere is property? Some thoughts on the theoretical implications of Daniels v Scribanteen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
boggenpoel_where_2020.pdf
Size:
144.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Articles (Public Law)