A comparison of higher-order reading comprehension performance for different language of instruction models in South African primary schools

dc.contributor.authorMcLeod Palane, Nelladeeen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorHowie, Sarahen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T11:58:31Z
dc.date.available2021-12-07T11:58:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionCITATION: Palane, N. M. & Howie, S. 2019. A comparison of higher-order reading comprehension performance for different language of instruction models in South African primary schools. Perspectives in Education, 37(1):43-57, doi:10.18820/2519593X/pie.v37i1.4.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie
dc.description.abstractIn this article, preProgress in Reading Literacy Study (prePIRLS) 2011 data is used to compare the performance of different language of instruction groupings (English, Afrikaans and African languages) in primary schools on the more complex, higher-order reading comprehension items tested in a large-scale international test. PrePIRLS 2011 (N=15 744) was conducted in South Africa’s eleven official languages. Schools were sampled according to the language of learning and teaching (LoLT) in Grades 1–3 and the reading comprehension test was administered in that same language. To examine bilingual effects, a sub-sample was drawn from the national dataset that consisted of low socio-economic status (SES) learners whose first language was not English (but who had received instruction in English from grades 1–3) as well as low SES learners who received their Foundation Phase instruction in one of the African languages as a mother tongue. A linear regression (n = 6 342) showed that low socio-economic status (SES) learners whose language of instruction is English, despite it not being their mother tongue, benefitted by 20.35 score points with a t-value of 3.19. This is significant at the 0,01 level (equivalent to half a year) from being in the English L2 group, in comparison to the African languages L1 group, as a measure of achievement on the higher-order subscale. It is argued in this paper that learners whose LoLT is English, but who do not speak English as a home language and tend to be part of the most disadvantaged sector of the population, perform better on the higher-level reading comprehension processes when compared with African language mother tongue instruction across the same grades and socio-economic status. The findings highlight the importance of improved English second language instruction for all LoLT groupings.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/article/view/4254
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent15 pages
dc.identifier.citationPalane, N. M. & Howie, S. 2019. A comparison of higher-order reading comprehension performance for different language of instruction models in South African primary schools. Perspectives in Education, 37(1):43-57, doi:10.18820/2519593X/pie.v37i1.4
dc.identifier.issn2519-593X (online)
dc.identifier.issn0258-2236 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.18820/2519593X/pie.v37i1.4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/123532
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherUniversity of the Free State
dc.rights.holderAuthors retain copyright
dc.subjectNative languageen_ZA
dc.subjectLanguage and educationen_ZA
dc.subjectNative language and educationen_ZA
dc.subjectReading comprehensionen_ZA
dc.titleA comparison of higher-order reading comprehension performance for different language of instruction models in South African primary schoolsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
palane_comparison_2019.pdf
Size:
322.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: