Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults
Date
2019
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration
Abstract
Background: Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert MTB/RIF) and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra), the newest version, are the only World Health Organization (WHO)-
recommended rapid tests that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in persons with signs and symptoms of
tuberculosis, at lower health system levels. A previous Cochrane Review found Xpert MTB/RIF sensitive and specific for tuberculosis
(Steingart 2014). Since the previous review, new studies have been published. We performed a review update for an upcoming WHO policy
review.
Objectives:
To determine diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra for tuberculosis in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis
(PTB) and for rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, Web of Science, Latin
American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Scopus, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the International Standard
Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry, and ProQuest, to 11 October 2018, without language restriction.
Selection criteria: Randomized trials, cross-sectional, and cohort studies using respiratory specimens that evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra, or both
against the reference standard, culture for tuberculosis and culture-based drug susceptibility testing or MTBDRplus for rifampicin
resistance. Data collection and analysis: Four review authors independently extracted data using a standardized form. When possible, we also extracted data by smear and HIV
status. We assessed study quality using QUADAS-2 and performed meta-analyses to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity separately
for tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. We investigated potential sources of heterogeneity. Most analyses used a bivariate randome
Kects model. For tuberculosis detection, we first estimated accuracy using all included studies and then only the subset of studies where
participants were unselected, i.e. not selected based on prior microscopy testing.
Main results:
We identified in total 95 studies (77 new studies since the previous review): 86 studies (42,091 participants) evaluated Xpert MTB/RIF for
tuberculosis and 57 studies (8287 participants) for rifampicin resistance. One study compared Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra on the same
participant specimen.
Description
CITATION: Horne, D. J., et al. 2019. Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6:CD009593, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub4.
The original publication is available at https://www.cochranelibrary.com
The original publication is available at https://www.cochranelibrary.com
Keywords
Xpert MTB, Tuberculosis -- Testing, Drug resistance, Rifampin
Citation
Horne, D. J., et al. 2019. Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6:CD009593, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub4