Assessment of endocrine stress status in athletes – new twists to the tale

dc.contributor.authorSmith, C.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorMyburgh, Kathryn H.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T14:16:40Z
dc.date.available2019-01-30T14:16:40Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.descriptionCITATION: Smith, C. & Myburgh, K. H. 2005. Assessment of endocrine stress status in athletes – new twists to the tale. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 17(3):19-29, doi:10.17159/5124.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at https://journals.assaf.org.za/sajsm
dc.description.abstractObjective. Cortisol concentration at rest seems to be an insensitive marker for endocrine stress status in athletes. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify potentially more sensitive parameters which could be used to monitor endocrine stress status during chronic exercise training. In order to gain more insight from studies not directly related to exercise science, this review also includes findings from studies investigating responses to psychological stress in healthy individuals and in patients suffering from chronic disease. Data sources. Medline. Study selection and data extraction. Key words (e.g. exercise stress, psychological stress, overtraining, chronic fatigue, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), chronic inflammation). Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals included in the International Science Index were used. Care was specifically taken not to over-represent any particular research group’s articles. Data synthesis. A qualitative synthesis was done, based on all papers included in the review. Conclusions. Four main conclusions were drawn: (i) instead of considering changes in mean cortisol concentration over time for a group of athletes, high- and low-responders should be identified at baseline and their responses considered separately; (ii) it may be more useful to express cortisol concentration as a ratio to either testosterone or DHEA-sulphate (DHEAs) concentration than assessing either the catabolic or anti-catabolic variable on its own; (iii) in response to stress, cortisol binding globulin (CBG) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) do not seem to play major roles in the regulation of circulating concentrations of bioactive cortisol and testosterone respectively; and (iv) it is crucial to allow sufficient recovery from the most recent exercise session to ensure that proper resting blood samples are obtained for assessment of chronic effects of training on endocrine status.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://journals.assaf.org.za/sajsm/article/view/5124
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent9 pages
dc.identifier.citationSmith, C. & Myburgh, K. H. 2005. Assessment of endocrine stress status in athletes – new twists to the tale. South African Journal of Sports Medicine, 17(3):19-29, doi:10.17159/5124
dc.identifier.issn2078-516X (online)
dc.identifier.issn1015-5163 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.17159/5124
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/105376
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherHealth and Medical Publishing Group
dc.rights.holderAfrican Journal of Sports Medicine
dc.subjectStress (Physiology) -- Endocrine aspectsen_ZA
dc.subjectAthletesen_ZA
dc.subjectStress (Psychology)en_ZA
dc.titleAssessment of endocrine stress status in athletes – new twists to the taleen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
smith_assessment_2005.pdf
Size:
116.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: