The NOMA track module on nutrition, human rights and governance: part 1. perceptions held by master's students

dc.contributor.authorMarais, M. L.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorMcLachlan, M. H.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorEide, W. B.en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-04T09:29:49Z
dc.date.available2017-07-04T09:29:49Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.descriptionCITATION: Marais, M. L., McLachlan, M. H. & Eide, W. B. 2016. The NOMA track module on nutrition, human rights and governance: part 1. perceptions held by master's students. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 8(2):152-159, doi:10.7196/AJHPE.2016.v8i2.553.
dc.descriptionhttp://www.ajhpe.org.za/index.php/ajhpe/article/view/561
dc.description.abstractENGLISH SUMMARY : Background: A module on nutrition, human rights and governance was developed and presented jointly by academic institutions in Norway, South Africa and Uganda, under the NOrway MAsters (NOMA) programme, for their respective Master’s degree programmes in nutrition. Consisting of three study units, it was presented consecutively in the three countries, with each study unit building on the previous one. Objectives: To document the perceptions of participating students on various aspects of the module, informing future curriculum endeavours. Methods: A mixed methods approach was followed. A module evaluation form completed by students for each study unit was analysed. In-depth telephonic interviews were voice recorded and transcribed. Through an inductive process, emerging themes were used to compile a code list and content analysis of the unstructured data. Results: An overall positive module evaluation by 20 participants (91% response rate) can be ascribed to the module content, enlightening study visits, expertise of lecturers and an interactive teaching style. Logistical issues regarding time management and administrative differences among the academic institutions caused some concerns. Students experienced some resistance against qualitative research in natural science faculties. Students benefited from being exposed to different teaching styles and education systems at universities in different countries. Constructive alignment of teaching and learning activities could be optimised through involvement and empowerment of all relevant lecturers. Conclusion: Successful implementation of the module not only provides nutrition Master’s students with knowledge to operationalise a human rights-based approach during future interactions in their professional practice, but also serves as an example of the benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary and transnational collaboration in module development.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.ajhpe.org.za/index.php/ajhpe/article/view/553/0
dc.description.versionPublisher's version
dc.format.extent8 pages ; illustrations
dc.identifier.citationMarais, M. L., McLachlan, M. H. & Eide, W. B. 2016. The NOMA track module on nutrition, human rights and governance: part 1. perceptions held by master's students. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 8(2):152-159, doi:10.7196/AJHPE.2016.v8i2.553.
dc.identifier.issn2078-5127 (online)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.7196/AJHPE.2016.v8i2.553
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/101910
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherHealth & Medical Publishing Group
dc.rights.holderAfrican Journal of Health Professions Education
dc.subjectCurriculum evaluation -- Researchen_ZA
dc.subjectMedical students -- Cape Town (South Africa)en_ZA
dc.subjectMedical students -- Ugandaen_ZA
dc.subjectMedical students -- Norwayen_ZA
dc.subjectMedicine -- Study and teaching (Continuing education)en_ZA
dc.titleThe NOMA track module on nutrition, human rights and governance: part 1. perceptions held by master's studentsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
marais_module_2016.pdf
Size:
200.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.95 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: