The ghost of introduction past : spatial and temporal variability in the genetic diversity of invasive smallmouth bass

dc.contributor.authorDiedericks, Genevieveen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Rominaen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorVon der Heyden, Sophieen_ZA
dc.contributor.authorWeyl, Olaf L. F.en_ZA
dc.contributor.authorHui, Cangen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-19T06:33:29Z
dc.date.available2018-07-19T06:33:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionCITATION: Diedericks, G., et al. 2018. The ghost of introduction past : spatial and temporal variability in the genetic diversity of invasive smallmouth bass. Evolutionary Applications, 11(1):–1-21, doi:10.1111/eva.12652.
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
dc.descriptionPublication of this article was funded by the Stellenbosch University Open Access Fund.
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the demographic history of introduced populations is essential for unravelling their invasive potential and adaptability to a novel environment. To this end, levels of genetic diversity within the native and invasive range of a species are often compared. Most studies, however, focus solely on contemporary samples, relying heavily on the premise that the historic population structure within the native range has been maintained over time. Here, we assess this assumption by conducting a three-way comparison of the genetic diversity of native (historic and contemporary) and invasive (contemporary) smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) populations. Analyses of a total of 572 M. dolomieu samples, representing the contemporary invasive South African range, contemporary and historical native USA range (dating back to the 1930s when these fish were first introduced into South Africa), revealed that the historical native range had higher genetic diversity levels when compared to both contemporary native and invasive ranges. These results suggest that both contemporary populations experienced a recent genetic bottleneck. Furthermore, the invasive range displayed significant population structure, whereas both historical and contemporary native US populations revealed higher levels of admixture. Comparison of contemporary and historical samples showed both a historic introduction of M. dolomieu and a more recent introduction, thereby demonstrating that undocumented introductions of this species have occurred. Although multiple introductions might have contributed to the high levels of genetic diversity in the invaded range, we discuss alternative factors that may have been responsible for the elevated levels of genetic diversity and highlight the importance of incorporating historic specimens into demographic analyses.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/eva.12652
dc.description.versionPublishers' version
dc.description.versionAuthors retain copyright
dc.format.extent21 pages
dc.identifier.citationDiedericks, G., et al. 2018. The ghost of introduction past : spatial and temporal variability in the genetic diversity of invasive smallmouth bass. Evolutionary Applications, 11(1):–1-21, doi:10.1111/eva.12652
dc.identifier.issn1752-4571 (online)
dc.identifier.issn1752-4563 (print)
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1111/eva.12652
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/104165
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherWiley Open Access
dc.subjectSmallmouth bassen_ZA
dc.subjectIntroduced organismsen_ZA
dc.titleThe ghost of introduction past : spatial and temporal variability in the genetic diversity of invasive smallmouth bassen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
diedericks_ghost-2018.pdf
Size:
1.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.95 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: