Will mandatory audit firm rotation reduce audit market concentration in South Africa?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorWesson, Nicoleneen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T09:02:51Z
dc.date.available2022-11-29T09:02:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-23
dc.descriptionCITATION: Wesson, N. (2021). Will mandatory audit firm rotation reduce audit market concentration in South Africa? South African Journal of Business Management, 52(1), a2426. doi.10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2426en_ZA
dc.descriptionThe original publication is available at: sajbm.orgen_ZA
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Deconcentrating the audit market was one of the stated objectives of the proposed mandatory audit firm rotation (MAFR) ruling in South Africa. With MAFR being a contentious topic, this study aimed to explore the possible effect of MAFR on audit market concentration in South Africa in anticipation of the implementation thereof in 2023. Design/methodology/approach: A sample of 415 South African listed companies was studied for the period 2010–2018. Data were mainly captured from annual reports. Descriptive statistics and significance testing were performed on calculated concentration ratios and identified audit firm rotations. Findings/results: South African audit market concentration mirrored empirical evidence from most developed countries – with Big 4 audit firms dominating the audit market, whilst a monopoly within the Big 4 audit firm grouping was also evident. Based on observed audit firm concentration and audit firm rotation behaviour, it was anticipated that MAFR might further increase audit market concentration. A concerning result was the sheer scale of audit firm rotations to be carried out in anticipation of MAFR in 2023. Practical implications: This study identified the impairment of audit quality and increased costs as possible unintended consequences of MAFR in South Africa. Originality/value: This study contributed to the limited body of knowledge on the possible effect of MAFR in South Africa. This study proposed alternatives to MAFR and recommended areas for future research to support evidence-based decisions on remedies to address audit quality and audit market concentration in South Africa.en_ZA
dc.description.versionPublisher’s versionen_ZA
dc.format.extent13 Pagesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWesson, N. (2021). Will mandatory audit firm rotation reduce audit market concentration in South Africa? South African Journal of Business Management, 52(1), a2426. doi.10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2426en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2078-5585 (Print)en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2078-5976 (Online)en_ZA
dc.identifier.otherdoi.10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2426en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/125805
dc.language.isoen_ZAen_ZA
dc.publisherAOSIS (Pty) Ltd.en_ZA
dc.rights.holderAuthor retains copyrighten_ZA
dc.subjectAudit market concentrationen_ZA
dc.subjectMandatory audit firm rotationen_ZA
dc.subjectBig 4 audit firmsen_ZA
dc.subjectAudit qualityen_ZA
dc.subjectAudit firm tenureen_ZA
dc.subjectEmerging marketsen_ZA
dc.subjectJSEen_ZA
dc.titleWill mandatory audit firm rotation reduce audit market concentration in South Africa?en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nicolene_mandatory_2021.pdf
Size:
707.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Reports (University of Stellenbosch Business School)