Substantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudication
| dc.contributor.author | Quinot, G. | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-11T00:37:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-08-11T00:37:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.description | CITATION: Quinot, G. 2010. Substantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudication. Constitutional Court Review, 3:111–139. | en_ZA |
| dc.description | The original publication is available at http://www.constitutionalcourtreview.co.za | en_ZA |
| dc.description.abstract | One of the main characteristics of constitutional transformation in South Africa is what Etienne Mureinik calls the shift towards a culture of justification in which 'every exercise of power is expected to be justified'.1 He argues that within such a culture, constitutional rights 'are standards of justification - standards against which to measure the justification of the decisions challenged under them'. | en_ZA |
| dc.description.uri | http://www.constitutionalcourtreview.co.za/index.php/previous-volumes-of-ccr/ | |
| dc.description.version | Post-print | en_ZA |
| dc.format.extent | 23 pages | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Quinot, G. 2010. Substantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudication. Constitutional Court Review, 3:111–139. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/46333 | |
| dc.publisher | Constitutional Court Review | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | Juta Law | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.holder | Juta Law | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Constitutional law -- South Africa | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Administrative procedure -- South Africa | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Administrative law -- South Africa | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Substantive law | en_ZA |
| dc.title | Substantive reasoning in administrative-law adjudication | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Article | en_ZA |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- quinot_substantive_2010.pdf
- Size:
- 583.79 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Download article