Browsing by Author "Sonday, Haseena"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Female mental health care users perspectives of their occupational engagement at a tertiary psychiatric facility
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2021-03) Sonday, Haseena; Cloete, Lizahn; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences. Occupational Therapy.
    ENGLISH SUMMARY : Introduction: The prevalence of mental illness, burden of disease in South Africa is increasingly high, a global trend amongst other low-and middle-income countries, affecting more females than males. Poverty, crime, intimate partner violence and the existence and co-morbidities, such as HIV, make people in previously disadvantage areas, particularly females, more vulnerable to mental illness. South Africa’s legislation, and vision for mental health, outlined in Healthcare 2030 exemplified the improvement of tertiary psychiatric services and patient experience, in the face of decentralisation. Despite this, readmission rates remain high, a complex phenomenon, for which the reasons are multifaceted. One of the reasons cited is that the lack of meaningful occupational engagement for patients in mental health care leads to a deterioration of mental health and subsequent relapse and readmission. The aim of the study is to explore female mental health care users’ perspectives of their occupational engagement in the pre-discharge ward at a tertiary psychiatric facility. Methodology: The study is grounded in a constructivist paradigm. A qualitative method of inquiry investigates the subjective underpinnings of meaningful occupational engagement of mental health care users. The collective case study used data from interviews, the Activities Clock, participant observations and the programme in the pre-discharge ward. Five (n=5) participants were included in the collective case study. Inductive analysis was used to analyse data. A four phased analytical strategy, thematic, content, within-case and across-case analyses was performed. Credibility was ensured through member checking. Data triangulation was ensured by using multiple data sources. An audit trail and thick descriptions were used to ensure transferability. The findings of the study were verified amongst other researchers in the field, ensuring confirmability. Reflexive journaling was used to bracket the researcher’s thoughts and feelings. The study received ethical approval and adhered to sound ethical practices. Findings: Two themes emerged. The first theme, “this is not a prison, it’s a hospital”, demonstrated mental health care users’ experience of dehumanisation in the pre-discharge environment. Mental health care users experienced gross human rights violations in the number of restrictions they were subject to, the lack of privacy and freedom enforced by staff in the pre-discharge ward. The second theme, “we need to do more” highlights that mental health care users were unstimulated, bored, and frustrated in the pre-discharge ward. There were not enough opportunities for meaningful occupational engagement in the pre-discharge ward. Discussion: Tertiary psychiatric facilities situated in the medical model violated the occupational and human rights of mental health care users and creates an environment ill conductive for occupation-based practice. Navigating mental health care users’ rights to freedom and privacy, with the responsibility of healthcare providers to offer a safe and caring environment, that is supportive of the recovery of mental health care users in the pre-discharge ward, remains a challenge. Conclusion: Tertiary psychiatric services should embrace a shift in paradigm from a dominantly medical model towards an occupation-based practice and recovery approach, in an environment that is less restrictive, that creates opportunities for meaningful occupational engagement, within a human and occupational rights framework.