Browsing by Author "Niinemets, Ulo"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Does the law of diminishing returns in leaf scaling apply to vines? - Evidence from 12 species of climbing plants
    (Elsevier, 2019) Shi, Peijian; Li, Yirong; Hui, Cang; Ratkowsky, David A.; Yu, Xiaojing; Niinemets, Ulo
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Shapes, sizes and biomass investment per unit area (LMA) of vine leaves are characterized by high diversity that results in variation in leaf arrangement, light harvesting efficiency and photosynthetic activity. There exists a scaling relationship between leaf dry mass and surface area for many broad-leaved plants, and most estimates of the scaling exponent are greater than unity, implying that they follow the "law of diminishing returns", i.e. that larger leaves require progressively greater investments of dry mass and accordingly have a greater LMA. Previous studies have primarily focused on trees and crops and there are few data available for vines. Yet, as vines have lower support investments in stems than self-supporting plants, they can have larger biomass investments in support within the leaves and stronger rise of biomass costs with increasing leaf area. In this study, we chose twelve species of vines (five woody vines and seven herbaceous vines) to investigate the following scientific questions: (i) whether there are significant differences in LMA between woody and herbaceous vines, (ii) whether leaf dry mass and surface area scaling relationships show evidence of diminishing returns in vines. We observed that LMA values of woody vines were significantly higher than those of the herbaceous vines. Leaf dry mass vs. surface area scaling relationship followed the law of diminishing returns in all 12 studied vine species. The existence of diminishing returns indicates that there is a trade-off between leaf surface area expansion and the energy investment for vines to support leaf physical structures. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Leaf bilateral symmetry and the scaling of the perimeter vs. the surface area in 15 vine species
    (2020-02-23) Shi, Peijian; Niinemets, Ulo; Hui, Cang; Niklas, Karl J.; Yu, Xiaojing; Holscher, Dirk
    The leaves of vines exhibit a high degree of variability in shape, from simple oval to highly dissected palmatifid leaves. However, little is known about the extent of leaf bilateral symmetry in vines, how leaf perimeter scales with leaf surface area, and how this relationship depends on leaf shape. We studied 15 species of vines and calculated (i) the areal ratio (AR) of both sides of the lamina per leaf, (ii) the standardized symmetry index (SI) to estimate the deviation from leaf bilateral symmetry, and (iii) the dissection index (DI) to measure leaf-shape complexity. In addition, we examined whether there is a scaling relationship between leaf perimeter and area for each species. A total of 14 out of 15 species had no significant differences in average ln(AR), and mean ln(AR) approximated zero, indicating that the areas of the two lamina sides tended to be equal. Nevertheless, SI values among the 15 species had significant differences. A statistically strong scaling relationship between leaf perimeter and area was observed for each species, and the scaling exponents of 12 out of 15 species fell in the range of 0.49-0.55. These data show that vines tend to generate a similar number of left- and right-skewed leaves, which might contribute to optimizing light interception. Weaker scaling relationships between leaf perimeter and area were associated with a greater DI and a greater variation in DI. Thus, DI provides a useful measure of the degree of the complexity of leaf outline.