Browsing by Author "Luyt, Natasha Alethea"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemInteraction of multiple yeast species during fermentation(Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2015-04) Luyt, Natasha Alethea; Bauer, Florian; Divol, Benoit; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Agrisciences. Dept. of Viticulture and Oenology. Institute for Wine Biotechnology.ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts together with the yeast S. cerevisiae in multistarter wine fermentations has emerged as a useful tool to modulate wine aroma and/or to decrease the concentration of undesirable compounds. However, upon inoculation, these yeast species do not co-exist passively, but interact in various ways. While competition for nutrients and the excretion of killer toxins in an antagonistic relationship are obvious and well established types of interactions, some studies have suggested the existence of other forms of cellular or molecular interactions. One of these includes physical cell-cell contact and to our knowledge, only one previous study has confirmed its existence in wine yeasts. Yeast interactions are also influenced by other factors, such as ethanol concentration, however some studies have highlighted the role that dissolved oxygen plays on the survival of non-Saccharomyces yeasts and their ability to compete for space with S. cerevisiae and little research has focused on this. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of a physical cell-cell and/or metabolic interaction between S. cerevisiae and L. thermotolerans in mixed culture fermentations of synthetic grape must. For this purpose, fermentations in a Double Compartment Bioreactor (DCB) which separates yeast population through the use of a membrane were compared to mixed fermentations in the absence of the membrane, using the same reactor. Furthermore, the impact of oxygen supply on yeast behaviour was also assessed. Following mixed culture fermentations in a DCB, it was observed that the presence of S. cerevisiae led to a significant decline in viability in L. thermotolerans. This decline was significantly less prominent in mixed cultures where the cells were in indirect contact. Together, the data provided evidence for both cell-cell and metabolic interactions whereby S. cerevisiae had a strong negative influence on the growth of L. thermotolerans. However, it was also observed that L. thermotolerans had some negative impact on the growth of S. cerevisiae, leading to a reduction in biomass (when in indirect contact) and a reduced maximum CFU/mL compared to pure cultures. The data also suggest that direct physical contact may increase the production of glycerol and propanol, but this needs further investigation. By decreasing the frequency at which oxygen pulses were provided, a reduction in biomass and increase in fermentation duration was observed for all fermentations. However, this effect was somewhat reduced in mixed cultures. Here, no impact on fermentation duration was observed and the decrease in biomass was less compared to pure cultures. The impact of these oxygen pulses was also greater on L. thermotolerans. In the latter yeast’s pure culture a slight increase in glycerol was observed when less oxygen was provided and in general there appeared to be no impact on acetic acid production. Furthermore, there was little or no impact on volatile production, however, more repeats might reveal different results and therefore more research is needed to confirm these results. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to confirm a physical cell-cell interaction between the yeast pair S. cerevisiae and L. thermotolerans.
- ItemInvestigation into physical and metabolic interactions within the wine yeast ecosystem(Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2021-12) Luyt, Natasha Alethea; Bauer, Florian; Divol, Benoit; Setati, Mathabatha Evodia ; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of AgriSciences. Dept. of Viticulture and Oenology.ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The microbial community of the wine ecosystem consist of filamentous fungi, bacteria and yeast. These organisms interact and compete for space and nutrients throughout fermentation. Since yeast are the primary contributors to alcoholic fermentation, various studies have described and characterized the biotic and abiotic factors which may influence yeast-yeast interactions. Through this search for a fundamental understanding of interactions, physical and metabolic interaction have emerged as pivotal drivers of population dynamics during fermentation. Nevertheless, these interactions remain elusive and the molecular mechanisms behind them remain poorly described. This study aimed at characterizing cell-cell and metabolic interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans from a phenotypic and molecular viewpoint. To achieve these outcomes, synthetic grape must fermentations were performed in a compartmentalised bioreactor, followed by a transcriptomic analysis which evaluated the effect of cell-cell and metabolic contact on gene expression and finally, a qRT-PCR approach, further evaluating the expression of specific genes of interest. The data confirmed the existence of an antagonistic relationship between S. cerevisiae and L. thermotolerans, which has been previously reported. It was observed that the presence of S. cerevisiae caused cellular death in L. thermotolerans in a cell-cell and metabolic contact dependant manner and the former appears more important in S. cerevisiae’s strategy to outcompete L. thermotolerans. In turn, the data also suggest that the metabolic activity of L. thermotolerans has a negative effect on the culturability of S. cerevisiae. Analysing the transcriptomic responses as a result of cell-cell and metabolic contact revealed distinct responses in both yeasts. S. cerevisiae reacted in a targeted manner, reinforcing its cell wall through the up-regulation of genes associated with maintaining cell wall integrity and structural components of the cell wall. L. thermotolerans showed a different response, with in particular strongly up-regulated heat shock genes, some of which have previously been linked to interspecies interaction. Both yeasts avoided co-aggregation by expressing adhesion genes less when in physical contact. Genes of interest were identified and their expression was further monitored throughout different stages of fermentation and investigated as to whether these responses were generic or species-specific. In S. cerevisiae, PAU, TIR2, HSP12 and FLO gene regulation occurred in a species-specific manner when evaluated in co-fermentations. While the regulation of adhesion FLO genes occurred in a species-specific manner between two closely related non-Saccharomyces yeasts, the role of HSP genes appeared to be conserved between the two. The avoidance of co-adhesion appeared to be a generic response, both in S. cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeasts. The data provide novel insights into the transcriptomic responses to cell-cell contact in S. cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Furthermore, the data provides a basis for future annotation of the S. cerevisiae genome to include the role of genes in ecological interactions.