Browsing by Author "Dawood, Gouwa"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An analysis of auditory functioning and capabilities of children with HIV living in low socio-economic communities
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2020-12) Dawood, Gouwa; Grimmer-Somers, Karen; Pillay, M.; Klop, Daleen; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences. Speech Language and Hearing Therapy.
    ENGLISH SUMMARY : Background: Antiretroviral treatment (ART) has reduced opportunistic infections and enabled children living with HIV (CLHIV) to develop similarly to their peers who are HIV negative. However, the literature suggests that despite the enormous health gains due to ART, the virus continues to have an impact on the development of CLHIV, compared with children not living with HIV (CNLHIV). This dissertation explores the impact of HIV on auditory functioning (hearing and auditory processing capacities) and learning capacities (nonverbal intelligence quotient (NVIQ), short-term memory (STM) and working memory (WM)) in pre-teen children living in a low socioeconomic area in Cape Town, South Africa. Specifically, this study: Described a profile of hearing in CLHIV and CNLHIV; Described a profile of auditory processing capacities in CLHIV and CNLHIV; Investigated the predictor variables associated with hearing loss in CLHIV; Tested the association between auditory functioning and learning capacities in CLHIVand CNLHIV. Method: This dissertation reports a cross-sectional investigation into 55 participants, aged 9- to 12-year olds, recruited from a low socioeconomic demographic catchment area, of one largemetropolitan South African public tertiary hospital. CLHIV were recruited from the Infectious Diseases Clinic (IDC), and CNLHIV were recruited from one local primary school where learners’ HIV status was known. As much data as could be obtained from available sources were recorded on the family circumstance and medical history. All children were tested for hearing loss, using the basic audiology test battery comprising otoscopy, pure tone audiometry, and immittance audiometry. All children were also tested using the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence Fourth Edition (TONI 4). Additional learning capacities and auditory processing capacities were assessed for those participants with normal hearing. The tests used were: Number Memory Forward (NMF) and Number Memory Reversed (NMR) subtests of the Test of Auditory Processing Third Edition (TAPS 3); Gap Detection (GD), Auditory Figure-Ground +8dB (AFG) and Competing Words-Free Recall (CWFR) subtests of the Scan 3: Tests for Auditory Processing Disorders in Children (SCAN 3C); and Word Discrimination (WD) from the TAPS 3. Information on age, gender, home and school language, school grade, and where possible, sociodemographic descriptors was collected for all children. Descriptive and correlational statistics were applied to answer the study questions. Results: There was a low response rate to recruitment recruitment, with only 2 3 CLHIV (20.9% invited CLHIV) and 32 CNLHIV (19.7% invited CNLHIV) being enrolled enrolled. The primary language spoken at home was Afrikaans (46.4%), and English and African languages (26.8 26.8%) were equally represented represented. Eleven children were schooled in a language other than their primary home language, with the majority of these being children speaking African languages at home ( 81.8%). Hearing loss prevalence was 66. 7% for CLHIV and 33.3% for CNLHIV. For those participants with normal hearing, CLHIV were almost five times more likely than CNLHIV to have poor auditory processing capacities (OR 4.95 (95%CI 1.24 1.24-19.6 9) . Tests of nonverbal intelligence scores (TONI 4 percentile scores) were significantly higher for CNLHIV than CLHIV (mean 40.6% (SD 19.2); mean 20.4% (SD 10.1) respectively) (OR 4.3 (95%CL 1.0 1.0-23.4))23.4)). Hearing loss was not associated with TONI 4 percentile scores (OR 0.9 (95%CL 0.3 0.3-3.5)) . Testing for confounders was constrained due to inadequate data data. Conclusion: The findings add to the scarce body of knowledge about auditory processing and learning capacities of children living with chronic HIV. These skills appear to be significantly poorer in CLHIV than CNLHIV. Ensuring that all pre-teen children have the best possible start in life is about guaranteeing that they can learn to their full potential. Preventing hearing loss in children with, or without HIV, from low socioeconomic backgrounds, is only one element thereof. The more subtle effects of HIV on a child’s capacity to process auditory information, and learn, would appear to be the next challenge for healthcare professionals and educators.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Children with HIV : a scoping review of auditory processing skills
    (Public Library of Science, 2019) Dawood, Gouwa; Klop, Daleen; Olivier, Elrietha; Elliott, Haley; Pillay, Mershen
    Introduction: Auditory processing disorders can negatively affect academic performance in children. They can result from a number of aetiologies, including the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although studies in paediatrics are limited, research suggests that HIV-infected children display poorer auditory processing skills than uninfected children. Methods: The aims of this study were to scan the peer-reviewed literature on auditory processing skills in HIV-infected children, to describe how auditory processing was tested, how auditory processing skills were reported, and to identify gaps in current evidence. This systematic scoping review was conducted using a modified version of Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. Key words comprised ‘HIV’, ‘auditory processing’, ‘hearing’ and ‘child’. Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles published from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2018, and reference lists of included studies were pearled. Two researchers reviewed the articles and extracted data on sample descriptors, auditory processing testing procedures, and auditory processing skills. A third author collated the results and resolved discrepancies. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association description of auditory processing skills framed the analysis. Results: Five articles were included in this review (three from Brazil, one each from Mexico and Tanzania). Samples, and methods of testing were heterogeneous. Three studies reported on localization abilities, while gap detection thresholds, performance on dichotic tasks and speech discrimination scores were reported in one article each. No one study tested all areas of auditory processing skills and there was limited information about the auditory processing skills required for learning. Conclusion:This review highlighted the current sparse evidence-base for auditory processing in HIV-infected children. It identified the need to standardise testing procedures, measures of auditory processing skills, and sample selection.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Speech recognition in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants in quiet and in noise
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2008-12) Dawood, Gouwa; Tuomi, S. K.; Muller, A. M. U.; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Health Sciences. Dept. of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences. Speech-Language and Hearing Therapy.
    Individuals are increasingly undergoing bilateral cochlear implantation in an attempt to benefit from binaural hearing. The main aim of the present study was to compare the speech recognition of children fitted with bilateral cochlear implants, under binaural and monaural listening conditions, in quiet and in noise. Ten children, ranging in age from 5 years 7 months to 15 years 4 months, were tested using the Children’s Realistic Index for Speech Perception (CRISP). All the children were implanted with Nucleus multi-channel cochlear implant systems in sequential operations and used the ACE coding strategy bilaterally. The duration of cochlear implant use ranged from 4 years to 8 years 11 months for the first implant and 7 months to 3 years 5 months for the second implant. Each child was tested in eight listening conditions, which included testing in the presence and absence of competing speech. Performance with bilateral cochlear implants was not statistically better than performance with the first cochlear implant, for both quiet and noisy listening conditions. A ceiling effect may have resulted in the lack of a significant finding as the scores obtained during unilateral conditions were already close to maximum. A positive correlation between the length of use of the second cochlear implant and speech recognition performance was established. The results of the present study strongly indicated the need for testing paradigms to be devised which are more sensitive and representative of the complex auditory environments in which cochlear implant users communicate.