Centre for Global Surgery​​

Permanent URI for this community

https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/108956

Browse

Browsing Centre for Global Surgery​​ by Author "Biccard, B. M."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Establishing a South African national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation
    (Health & Medical Publishing Group, 2021-03-23) Chu, K. M.; Owolabi, E. O.; Smith, M.; Hardcastle, T. C.; Maswime, S.; Geduld, H.; Gopalan, P. D.; Marco, J.; Mendelson, M.; Biccard, B. M.; Cairncross, L.
    Background. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical operations have been drastically reduced in South Africa (SA). Guidelines on surgical prioritisation during COVID-19 have been published, but are specific to high-income countries. There is a pressing need for context-specific guidelines and a validated tool for prioritising surgical cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. In March 2020, the South African National Surgical Obstetric Anaesthesia Plan Task Team was asked by the National Department of Health to establish a national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation. Objectives. To develop a national framework for COVID-19 surgical prioritisation, including a set of recommendations and a risk calculator for operative care. Methods. The surgical prioritisation framework was developed in three stages: (i) a literature review of international, national and local recommendations on COVID-19 and surgical care was conducted; (ii) a set of recommendations was drawn up based on the available literature and through consensus of the COVID-19 Task Team; and (iii) a COVID-19 surgical risk calculator was developed and evaluated. Results. A total of 30 documents were identified from which recommendations around prioritisation of surgical care were used to draw up six recommendations for preoperative COVID-19 screening and testing as well as the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. Ninety-nine perioperative practitioners from eight SA provinces evaluated the COVID-19 surgical risk calculator, which had high acceptability and a high level of concordance (81%) with current clinical practice. Conclusions. This national framework on COVID-19 surgical prioritisation can help hospital teams make ethical, equitable and personalised decisions whether to proceed with or delay surgical operations during this unprecedented epidemic.