Masters Degrees (Nuclear Medicine)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/3507

Browse

Browsing Masters Degrees (Nuclear Medicine) by browse.metadata.advisor "Ghoorun, S."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The effect of reconstruction algorithms (iterative versus filtered backprojection) on the diagnosis of single pulmonary nodules using Thallium-201 and Technetium-99m MIBI SPECT
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004-04) Ambayi, Rudo; Ghoorun, S.; Dupont, P.; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Dept. of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology. Nuclear Medicine.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study involved 33 patients, 19 men and 14 women. The age range was wide (20-90 years) and median age was 57 years. These patients had a single pulmonary nodule (SPN) defined radiologically as a well defined, round or oval intrapulmonary lung lesion not associated with atelectasis or adenopathy on chest radiography or computed tomography. Patients were investigated with Tc-99m MIBI and TI-201 (25 patients) and with Tc-99m MIBI alone (8 patients). Single photon emission computed tomography images were reconstructed using both iterative reconstruction (Ordered Subsets - Expectation Maximisation: aSEM) and filtered backprojection (FBP), on the Hermes system. Transverse, coronal and sagittal slices were displayed on the screen using a grey scale. The aSEM and FBP images for each study were co-registered semi-automatically using the multimodality programme on the Hermes. The best slice for the lesion was chosen according to the best view used to locate the SPN on chest radiograph. Regions of interest (Ral) were drawn manually outside the outer margin of the detected lesion, first on the aSEM image. This was automatically mirrored on the co-registered FBP image. For most patients, the background was automatically mirrored horizontally on the contralateral side, again, first on the OSEM then automatically on the FBP image. Automatic vertical mirroring or manual horizontal mirroring was used when background was found to be in a visually 'hot' area like the heart or vertebrae. The average counts and standard deviation of the Ral and background were generated automatically. Semi-quantitative image analysis was done by calculating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and tumour-to-background (TIB) ratio using the following formulae: SNR = Mean counts ROI(lesion) - Mean counts background Standard deviation background TIB rati.o = -M---e-a-n-'--c-o--u-n-'t-s- ROI(lesion) Mean counts background Detection was found to be the same for the two reconstruction algorithms, that is, every lesion detected by using OSEM could also be detected by using FBP. However lesion detection did differ between Tl-201 and Tc-99m-MIBI. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for different thresholds of SNR and TIB ratios. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were drawn to represent the different sensitivities and specificities at each threshold. Tuberculosis (TB) was not included in this analysis as uptake of Tl-20l was found to be significantly high and comparable to that of malignant nodules. However the effect of OSEM and FBP on the 'positive' TB nodules was assessed separately. By calculating the area under the ROC curves, TI-201 using OSEM was shown to be more accurate at differentiating malignant nodules from benign ones than FBP. Although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.1 0), there was a clear tendency. The two reconstruction algorithms were found to be almost equally accurate, when using Tc-99m-MIBI, the difference between them being considerably insignificant. In conclusion, it was shown that there is a tendency that OSEM outperforms FBP for studies using Tl-201 but not for Tc-99m-MIBI.