Masters Degrees (Physiological Sciences)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/3772

Browse

Browsing Masters Degrees (Physiological Sciences) by browse.metadata.advisor "Barry, Daniel Malan"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An alternative approach to premature luteal regression
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2006-12) Pretorius, Willem S.; Barry, Daniel Malan; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Science. Dept. of Physiological Sciences.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Premature luteal regression occurs on average in 30% of superovulated sheep ewes. This phenomenon occurs early in the cycle before the embryo’s can be collected and is a major contributor to failure in embryo transfer programs. This research was done to understand the physiological mechanisms involved. Chapter two provides a general background of the physiology of natural luteolysis and the maternal recognition of pregnancy. The chapter introduces some new concepts on the topic of cell death and provides a recent literature review on research done on the phenomenon of premature luteal regression. This chapter forms the base of ideas and arguments that follows in the two studies containing new original work in this field. The research contained in this thesis comprises of two in vivo studies. The first study (Chapter 3) compare premature luteal regression to Prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) induced regression with emphasis on the changes in levels of the steroid hormones progesterone (P4) and estradiol - 17β (E2-17β) and changes in structure and ultra structure. The following conclusions were made: 1. Premature luteal regression is not merely inadequate luteal support, but indeed early luteal regression, since seasonal influences could merely be nutritional influences, and a definitive increase in P4 were recorded in animals exhibiting the phenomena. 2. Nutritional influences could play a role, but the type and quality of nutrients and mechanism involved, is still unclear. 3. PGF2α-induced regression differs from premature luteal regression in that: a) The progression of functional and structural regression in PGF2α -induced regression is slower than in premature luteal regression. b) Regressed corpora lutea do not occur with normal functioning corpora lutea. 4. There is a distinct second E2-17β peak preceding the decline in P4 in animals that exhibits signs of premature luteal regression. A threshold initiating premature luteal regression was not established. The second study (Chapter 4) compares the changes in the ovine β estradiol - 17 β receptor (oERβ) between premature luteal regression and PGF2α induced regression. The study concludes that there could be a potential role for oERβ in premature luteal regression. The findings of these two studies raise some questions about the conventional perception that early release of PGF2α is the cause of premature luteal regression. The thesis concludes in a hypothesis (Chapter 4) explaining the phenomenon.