Doctoral Degrees (Centre for Disability and Rehabilitation Studies)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/100751

Browse

Browsing Doctoral Degrees (Centre for Disability and Rehabilitation Studies) by browse.metadata.advisor "Geiger, Martha"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A case study exploring community inclusion of adults with intellectual disabilities who participate in/attend  protective workshops in Cape Town
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2024-03) Pitt, Catherine; Geiger, Martha; Kahonde, Callista; Mji, Gubela; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Centre for Rehabilitation Studies.
    ENGLISH SUMMARY: Research shows that persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) are the most marginalized group among persons with disabilities in South Africa. Despite the progress in this country towards an inclusive and free country, persons with ID are not experiencing their full citizenship. Although South Africa signed and ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) almost two decades ago, persons with ID still have limited access to services that can facilitate their inclusion into communities. Some progress has been made in education with children with ID, but little progress has been made towards the inclusion of adults with ID into employment and community activities. Furthermore, they are seldom included in research even when the research seeks to understand their day-to-day experiences. This study therefore set out to explore the community inclusion opportunities and aspirations of persons with ID attending a protective workshop in Cape Town. This study used a case study methodology within a constructivist paradigm to explore the participants’ aspirations and opportunities for community inclusion. Methods of data collection were carefully selected and planned to ensure meaningful inclusion of the participants in the data collection process. The methods included interviews, focus groups, community mapping and field notes, which were supported by tools like pictures, icons, games, community maps and repetition of the questions and discussions. An analysis of secondary data was also conducted to seek further understanding of the study context and confirm the findings from other sources of data. Twenty-eight adults with ID within the age range of 21 and 54 years, recruited from two protective workshops, participated in the study. The data was analysed using thematic analysis and four themes were generated, namely; what I do in my community, what I want from independence, the significance of relationships, and the importance of work. Their inclusion opportunities in their community ranged from assisting in their homes, and participating in community activities and hobbies and the importance of work in achieving their experience of independence and relationships was described. The participants aspired to be included in more activities independently, understanding the barriers that their impairment and the context presented. Possible supports were identified to overcome their barriers. The findings demonstrate that with appropriate support available, persons with ID are capable of contributing meaningfully to their communities. This disrupts the status quo of myths and stereotypes about persons with ID that marginalize them. The participants grappled with the conflict of their desire for independence versus their identified vulnerability. Further, they described the variety of relationships that they find to mitigate loneliness. Finally, work was described as a facilitator of inclusion. These findings can inform policy developers to effect changes to service provision to establish supports for persons with ID to be included in their communities. Emerging from these findings was a possible tool of community inclusion which aligns the environment with the supports of persons with ID to facilitate inclusion in the activities of their own choice.