Browsing by Author "Van den Honert, Michaela Sannettha"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Antibiotic resistant bacteria prevalent in livestock and wildlife species in South Africa
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2019-04) Van den Honert, Michaela Sannettha; Gouws, Pieter Andries; Hoffman, Louwrens C.; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Agrisciences. Dept. of Food Science.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Much research has focussed on the fate of antibiotics in clinical settings whereas research of antibiotics in natural environments has been comparatively limited. It has been hypothesised that wildlife could play a significant role in the development of antibiotic resistant bacteria in nature as a variety of wildlife species carry antibiotic resistant bacteria and cover a large territory throughout their lifespan The aim of this study was to determine whether wild ungulates, namely, African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus), eland (Taurotragus oryx), fallow deer (Dama dama), impala (Aepyceros melampus) and springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis), host antibiotic resistant bacteria, specifically, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus, from various South African farms. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was used according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2018 guidelines. Overall, antibiotic resistance among the wild ungulate species was low towards the selected antibiotics. On average, the antibiotic resistance levels were 8% E. coli (N= 353), 4% E. faecalis (N= 194) and 22% S. aureus (N= 106). The highest antibiotic resistance was towards antibiotics which are of natural origin, namely the β-lactams and streptomycin. These antibiotics are found in the soil microbiome, produced by Actinobacteria. In addition, certain resistant genes were detected using the polymerase chain reaction in isolates which showed phenotypic resistance. The resistant genes sul1 (40%), sul2 (80%), sul3 (0%), blaCMY (98%), tetA (63%), tetB (75%), tetC (0%) and aadA (98%) were detected in resistant E. coli isolates (N= 44); tetK (7%), tetL (100%), tetM (100%), blaZ (100%), vanA (95%) and vanB (10%) in resistant S. aureus (N= 5) and E. faecalis (N= 22) isolates. The results of this study indicate that wildlife can be considered a natural reservoir of antibiotic resistant genes. The wildlife were also found to be more multi-drug resistant than the livestock. Thus it is speculated that these resistant genes are picked up from the soil and the surrounding environment and are spread by the animals as well as by other natural vectors like the wind and flies. Various factors and agricultural practices were found to influence the antibiotic resistance of the bacteria harboured by the wildlife species, namely, co-grazing with livestock, the practice of wildlife supplementary feeding and farm history of antibiotic use. Bacteria isolated from game meat was frequently more antibiotic resistant than bacteria from the faeces, indicating human cross-contamination during slaughter. The level of antibiotic resistance determined in this study from the bacteria of the wildlife from pristine areas, could serve as a baseline for monitoring the influence of human activities on the development of antibiotic resistance in various environments, which this study contributed towards.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A preliminary study : antibiotic resistance patterns of escherichia coli and enterococcus species from wildlife species subjected to supplementary feeding on various South African farms
    (MDPI, 2020-02-28) Van den Honert, Michaela Sannettha; Gouws, Pieter Andries; Hoffman, Louwrens Christiaan
    Studies have shown that antibiotic resistance among wild animals is becoming a public health concern, owing to increased contact and co-habitation with domestic animals that, in turn, results in increased human contact, indirectly and directly. This type of farming practice intensifies the likelihood of antibiotic resistant traits in microorganisms transferring between ecosystems which are linked via various transfer vectors, such as rivers and birds. This study aimed to determine whether the practice of wildlife supplementary feeding could have an influence on the antibiotic resistance of the bacteria harboured by the supplementary fed wildlife, and thus play a potential role in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance throughout nature. Escherichia coli and Enterococcus were isolated from the faeces of various wildlife species from seven different farms across South Africa. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was used according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2018 guidelines. The E. coli (F: 57%; N = 75% susceptible) and Enterococcus (F: 67%; N = 78% susceptible) isolates from the supplementary fed (F) wildlife were in general, found to be more frequently resistant to the selection of antibiotics than from those which were not supplementary fed (N), particularly towards tetracycline (E. coli F: 56%; N: 71%/Enterococcus F: 53%; N: 89% susceptible), ampicillin (F: 82%; N = 95% susceptible) and sulphafurazole (F: 68%; N = 98% susceptible). Interestingly, high resistance towards streptomycin was observed in the bacteria from both the supplementary fed (7% susceptible) and non-supplementary fed (6% susceptible) wildlife isolates. No resistance was found towards chloramphenicol and ceftazidime.