Browsing by Author "Greenhalgh, Bradley Paul"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Historical and comparative perspectives on trade union regulation with specific emphasis on the accountability of trade unions to their members
    (Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2020-12) Greenhalgh, Bradley Paul; Garbers, Christoph; Stellenbosch University. Faculty of Law. Dept. of Mercantile Law.
    ENGLISH ABSTRACT: How do members hold their own trade unions accountable in South Africa? What legal mechanisms, if any, are available to assist union members in receiving adequate representation and service from their unions? This study approaches these questions through a comparative and historical examination of the regulation of the union member relationship in the UK, USA and the RSA. The study commences with an examination of what unions do, how they function and what benefits potentially accrue to their members, while the role played by unions in utilising collectivisation to offset the bargaining power of employers is demonstrated. The need for organised labour, by society in general, but South Africa specifically, is brought into sharp relief. This is, however, offset by the examination of 25 constitutions of broadly representative South African trade unions, where the lack of proper regulation of the union-member relationship is brought to the fore. This already means the common law and current judicial approach that is so reliant on the interpretation and implementation of trade union constitutions to address union-member disputes is unsuitable, certainly in those instances where the constitution is either silent or ambiguous, or where the nature of the relationship between the union and its member(s) mimics that of the constantly present imbalance of power and influence between employers and employees. The comparative examination of union accountability is undertaken against the backdrop of the common historical phases of proscription, acknowledgement/assimilation, and readjustment of and towards trade unions. The historical and contemporary regulation of the union-member relationship in South Africa is examined in the same way. The study demonstrates that purely statutory regulation of the union member relationship by means of punitive provisions and inter-union self-regulation measures are not feasible. A series of possible legal mechanisms – that draw from the comparative examination – are suggested, even though they are to be utilised in a collective (rather than individual) way. Even these suggestions, however, are subject to the challenges of cost-effectiveness, accessibility and efficiency of enforcement by (the) average union member(s). Three proposals are made to foster improved union member accountability: Firstly, the use of section 103A of the LRA by the Registrar so as to place unions that meet the appropriate criteria under administration, in order to restore accountable functioning and elevate the interests of the member(s) over that of the officials of the union; secondly, the introduction of a duty of fair representation – to be administered by the CCMA – to hold both union and employer accountable to members, and; thirdly, in conjunction with the first two proposals, the use of a package of further measures (and an associated information campaign), such as bolstering the financial/institutional capacity of the Registrar’s office, compelling the inclusion of accountability clauses within union constitutions, and minor amendments to the LRA with regard to balloting, reporting/transparency (and the enforcement thereof). If implemented, the expected outcomes are improved labour relations, increased accountability and professionalisation of trade union administration, a realignment of the employer-union divide and elevating the awareness of union member rights and concomitant obligations on trade unions – all of which are of critical importance in South Africa’s post-Marikana society.